There was no fraud case known to the primary investigators, SEC and FSA, but the CIA and Japanese police intelligence started to interrogate me about my involvement, though I had no understanding what they were talking about. After this issue was revealed to the public, I realized what they were talking about, though there was no information about the criminal trace. The only thing all of us but spy knew was that something wrong was going on, but impossible to know as there was no detail.
They kept this interrogation as they should have believed I would sign a false confession as I was severely tortured in those days. They assumed they had an enough time to make a complicity case against me, as nobody knew how to proceed an investigation.
Then, I wrote a memo to the formal investigators where to focus on this issue, which accelerated an inspection tremendously. It was totally out of their imagination that I could find the way out and they even wrongly claimed I knew their scheme as I run the similar bogus business.
It wat totally nonsense, but they have continuously fabricated a false information, whatever I did, which was also one of the techniques to drive me a corner to accept a false charge.
In any way, the spy knew there was a crime before the formal investigators realized there was a crime, which indicated they knew a crime at least in autumn 2010 when I nearly contacted a founder of AIJ.
It implied that the police knew there was a fraud at late in that autumn, which might be solved at that time if they properly investigated as they also had a legal authority to proceed an investigation. This omission was critical to the general public as the damage might have been reduced at hundreds of million US dollar if they prohibited their asset management activity including acquirement of new customers.
The next issue was why they did not investigate into this case, even though they realized there was a fraud earlier than any others. The most probable cause was that the CIA and Japanese police intelligence were involved in the AIJ fraud case. There were many ways how they were related to the case, though at least they were at the position to know there was a criminal activity.
There is another possibility that the police left this activity free to monitor how they would proceed. If that was the case, they used this crime to frame me or others to associate with it. This action might have been wrong as they let a tremendous amount of pension money gone in front of their watch, and at the same time, they used this case for other operations in their minds.
Either of them must be the right answer, where there were no others, which indicated the Japanese police intelligence was so corrupted. Although, this is not just a matter of the corruption, as they were indirectly responsible for the money lost in this scheme. My witness is apparently not enough, but this might be proceeded to the national redress when finding further information.
Or, the police should have investigated this case and admitted their wrongdoing, which is their legal obligation.